I don't think this will be a popular view, but here goes:
I worry that we're throwing all we've got a all the big media outlets without paying attention to the risk of the attention reaching a crescendo and then nobody wanting to carry the story again because its old news and they think the audience is tired of it. I also am concerned about the timing because our international news right now is seemingly dominated by the very real danger at the Mexican border, so maybe David wouldn't get the right level of coverage. I don't want to have to beg the big media outlets to give David's story repeat coverage later because we spent all of our bullets too fast.
I'm just offering a thought for consideration. Please don't blast me for it.
Thanks!
There's always going to be big and old news... that's how it works... but the developments of the story always bring new points of consideration, there's always going to be food for reporters' speculations and ---
this is about an International case that has just "hit home" (Brazil) and, while to
some this may be seen as 'old news', in Brasil they just began to cover it a few weeks ago; now their media is talking about it! it is the development of the story that will keep the audience attention and the supporters tuned! The ruling is coming and there will be loads of news on the issue... besides...
Sean is not home yet.... so we'll need to keep the attention of the public, gov't officials here and, of course, of the media to the case, as
this is going to enter a new chapter in just a few weeks, or days 