0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
TRF-2 rulling can be appealed, in theory, both to STJ and STF ( the Supreme Court). I think Tunevsk has already explained the details about these kinds of Appeals (Special Appeal to STJ, and Extraordinary Appeal to STF). Doesn´t matter who was favored by the decison, both sides have the right to appeal. It works for David, but it also works for JPLS. A TRF-2 decision would only become final if the looser side does not appeal on time, or give up to fill an appeal, or even if his appeal has a procedural mistake and then TRF can deny sending the proceeding to STJ/STF. In general, the decisions from TRF, as any other second instance court, can be immediately enforceable. So, it´s better to hope a favourable decision to David from TRF, but, again, JPLS can ask to STJ/STF an preliminary decision to stay TRF´s rulling. thanks noah, but I do not intend to be a lawyer, my first goal is to be a judge, preferably a federal judge.Before I pass the exams to be a judge, I may have to work as a lawyer, at least for three years, but I didn´t make a choice yet.
Reading the Google translation, it is hard for me to assess what this means exactly. But I'd be very careful with anything CEDCA says. My impression (which could be wrong) was that CEDCA is made up of former judges from the Rio State Family Court system that are in PLS pocket. In fact, Siro Darlan attorney/advisor (and former family court judge in Rio) for CEDCA made some outrageous statements favorable to JPLS and very negative about David and the Bringseanhome.org website back in March. "Para o desembargador (Siro Darlan), estrategicamente, interessou ao pai americano a divulgação da imagem do menino. "Ele está fazendo um uso perverso da imagem do próprio filho", criticou. "Para o desembargador (Siro Darlan), o padrasto do menino se preocupa mais com a integridade física eo desenvolvimento sadio do garoto do que o pai biológico." http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=pt&u=http://observatorio.ultimosegundo.ig.com.br/artigos.asp%3Fcod%3D528IMQ006&ei=sxBOSqLHMeWvtwfu_q2qBA&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=3&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3DCEDCA%2B%2B%2522paulo%2Blins%2Be%2Bsilva%2522%26hl%3Den%26rlz%3D1R2ADBF_enUS329 I also don't like the reference to "shifting the analysis" from the Hague to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child either, as it mirrors Tostes statements to the STF. I'd take a wait and see approach with this one.